1. Is the problem specific?
Turn “we want AI efficiency” into one observable action, such as classifying inquiries or preparing an internal draft.
Whether an automation idea is ready for development usually depends on process, data and permissions before it depends on a model name. Use this checklist for a first internal review.
Turn “we want AI efficiency” into one observable action, such as classifying inquiries or preparing an internal draft.
Write when the action starts, who starts it and which situations must stay out of scope.
List emails, spreadsheets, manuals, history or system fields, including versions, formats and gaps.
Name the salesperson, manager, service team, warehouse or system that will use the result.
Keep pricing, delivery promises, contracts, claims and external sends behind an explicit review step.
Check APIs, accounts, read/write scope, data location and network conditions. Missing access changes the plan.
Choose reviewable indicators such as field error rate, handling time, edit rate or knowledge coverage.
Agree on updates, exceptions, logs, rollback and future costs so the workflow has an owner after launch.
Choose one observable workflow and describe its inputs, recipient and approval points. With a redacted one-page brief, you can use WeChat or WhatsApp to discuss scope, current systems, access and acceptance. The contact entry starts a conversation; it is not a quote, project approval or outcome guarantee.
Write the business context, single first workflow, trigger, inputs, output format, recipient, approvals, system boundary and acceptance indicators. Remove unnecessary names, order numbers and secrets. Pricing, delivery scope, data location and maintenance are confirmed case by case.
It does not replace security, compliance, procurement, contract or commercial reviews, and it cannot guarantee better conversion or revenue. Customer data, cross-border transfer, external models and third-party systems need review by the responsible owner under the real business conditions.