Custom AI agents for schools and education institutions in Japan: lesson plans, notices and handover documents drafted from the school's own materials and formats, released only after teacher approval. This page is a service design and proposal outline; the scenarios shown are design examples.
Talk through your workflow →Japanese teachers work some of the longest hours in the OECD. According to the MEXT TALIS 2024 survey, primary school teachers work 52.1 hours per week and lower secondary teachers 55.1 hours (averages: 40.4 / 41 hours); lesson preparation alone takes 7.8 / 8.2 hours, and general administrative work another 4.5 / 5.2 hours.
What actually consumes the time is the repeated cycle of searching, drafting and checking: finding a rule, finding a material, writing a notice, writing a handover. We hand that stretch of work to an agent customized on your school's own materials — the teacher keeps only the final judgment.
Source: MEXT, TALIS 2024.
Anyone can open a general-purpose generative AI, but it does not know which version of your school rules applies, what format your notices use, or which document which role may see. Our customization works the other way round:
Pick two high-frequency, clearly defined tasks from the three areas, get them running, then expand.
From your internal curriculum plans and licensed teaching materials, the agent drafts lesson plans, tiered questions and assessment criteria, with sources cited item by item. Difficulty is set for the class; the teacher judges suitability and exports to Word / PDF.
School rules, event schedules and procedure manuals become a searchable evidence base. Rule questions are answered with versions; parent notices and handover documents are drafted in the school's format and sent only after the responsible person confirms facts and wording. Teachers change; the standard does not.
Headquarters manages course, fee and rescheduling rules centrally, and every classroom drafts inquiry replies and lesson reports from the same basis. Exceptions the rules do not cover are never promised automatically — they go straight to the classroom's responsible person. Many classrooms, one standard.
Every step leaves a record: which document was used, which version, and who approved it. If something goes wrong, it can be traced back to its basis.
The following is an example rollout cadence. The actual schedule is confirmed after assessment, based on the school's scale and scope; it is not a fixed commitment.
Interview staff, select the first two tasks, and map materials, permissions and a time baseline.
Build the agent and output examples; staff use it in real work and join training sessions while we refine it.
Re-measure total time and output quality on the same tasks, hand over the guide, and agree maintenance terms before expanding.
Delivery is more than the system itself: environment and materials setup, two online training sessions, an administrator's handbook, pilot and final delivery reports, and Japanese-language support and maintenance. We handle development and rollout; your school keeps business judgment and control over material licensing.
Custom projects generally move through four stages — assessment, proposal, development, acceptance. Stage durations are confirmed after assessment and are not stated as fixed commitments.
